|
||||
|
||||
March
19, 2002
Waited
long enough to make workplace safer
By
JOHN J. SWEENEY ONE
year ago this week, after token debate, Congress voted to repeal a rule
protecting American workers from the biggest workplace health and safety
hazard today. On March 20, 2001, in his first significant legislative action,
President Bush repealed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's
ergonomics standard. Since the rule was overturned, 1.8 million workers
have suffered ergonomic-related injuries such as back injuries and carpal
tunnel syndrome -- many that could have been prevented. They include dedicated
nurses who have had to give up their chosen profession of caring for our
sick families and friends. They include the low-wage workers who process
the food we put on our tables every day, including many poultry workers
throughout Texas. In order to ease the consciences of congressional representatives
who voted to repeal the ergonomics standard that had been 10 years in the
making, Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao promised on the eve of the vote
to lay out "a comprehensive approach" to ergonomics "that may include rulemaking."
She promised the administration would announce their plan by the end of
September. When that deadline was understandably delayed due to the tragic
events of Sept. 11, she then committed to take action by the end of the
fall, and then by the end of the year. Today, a year later, no action has
been taken. Millions of American workers continue to wait, continue to
work in pain and continue to lose their livelihoods from these injuries.
The only response we've seen from the Bush administration is the recess
appointment of Eugene Scalia, one of the main architects of industry's
decade-long campaign against protecting workers from these disorders, to
the powerful job of solicitor of labor. The most disturbing aspect of the
Bush administration's failure to act is the fact that these injuries are
well recognized and easily preventable. Two
congressionally mandated National Academy of Sciences studies sought by
opponents of the ergonomics standard found that work-related musculo-skeletal
disorders are a serious, widespread problem. These studies also found that
ways exist to prevent these disorders by making changes in the workplace
that are often easy and inexpensive, yet save many times their cost in
workers' compensation and medical savings. In fact, the National Academy
of Sciences estimates that doing nothing about ergonomic injuries is costing
our economy more than $50 billion each year. Meanwhile, in poultry processing
companies like Pilgrim's Pride in Lufkin, "Workers with repetitive stress
injuries are given aspirin and ice and sent back to the production line,"
according to United Food and Commercial Workers International Vice President
John Rodriguez. The UFCW has just filed a complaint with the Labor Department
over conditions at Pilgrim's Pride where the majority of workers at the
Lufkin plant, like most poultry plants, are new immigrants and minority
workers who are afraid to report injuries even though they are undergoing
surgery at "epidemic" rates. But instead of working constructively with
the Department of Labor to fashion a response to this workplace epidemic,
anti-regulatory ideologues in the Chamber of Commerce, the National Association
of Manufacturers and other industry associations continue to argue that
there is no science behind ergonomics, and continue to oppose not only
an OSHA ergonomics regulation, but even voluntary guidelines and standards.
On this sad anniversary let us pause to remember the millions of working
people whose lives are ruined every year just by going to work every day.
And in this time when Enron's corporate crimes have robbed thousands of
their jobs and retirement savings, let's also take this opportunity to
demand that our government not allow unscrupulous companies to take away
workers' health as well. Sweeney, based in Washington, D.C., is president of the AFL-CIO. |
March
19, 2002, 9:51PM
Union
vote scheduled at Reliant
By
L.M. SIXEL The
field service representatives at Reliant Energy will vote Thursday on whether
they want to be represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical
Workers Local 66 in Houston. The 114 employees are the ones who put the
power on or cut it off when customers move or don't pay their bill. The
employees approached Local 66, said Mike Mosteit, business representative
and organizer for the union. The union already represents about 2,900 linemen,
truck drivers, warehouse workers and shop workers at Reliant. The employees
haven't had much of a wage increase in the past five years, Mosteit said.
Many of the employees have been working at Reliant for 25 and 30 years.
They also would like to have more of a voice in their work, such as promotions
and discipline, Mosteit said. Raises are based on performance, so some
representatives have had more increases than others, said Tom Standish,
president of Reliant Energy HL&P/Entex. But overall, raises haven't
been great, he said, averaging 3 percent a year for the past three to four
years. Promotions and discipline are always reserved for management, Standish
said. But he said the company does welcome employee input on work rules
and how to improve efficiency. It has "best practice" teams to come up
with rules and improvement procedures, he said. Reliant has brought in
a consultant to try to convince the employees not to vote for a union,
said Mosteit. They've been having "captive audience" meetings daily for
the past month with employees. Standish said Reliant isn't trying to bash
the union. But, he said, the company believes it's not in the best interest
of the employees or the company to join the union. Also, the consulting
firm knows the ins and outs of labor-organizing rules, which are quite
complicated, he said. Copyright 2002 Houston Chronicle |
March
20, 2002, 12:57AM
Oklahoma
workers picket officers in Houston
By
L.M. SIXEL Employees
from Continental Carbon Co. have been passing out leaflets and carrying
picket signs in the neighborhoods of its two top officers here to protest
a lockout last May at the company's Ponca City, Okla., plant. The employees
from Ponca City paraded with protest signs and photographs of Continental
Carbon's President Kim Pan in front of Pan's gated community in west Houston.
They then went to the parking lot of a nearby supermarket and passed out
leaflets there, said Rick Abraham, director of Texans United, a statewide
environmental group that was part of the protest. The group also picketed
in front of the home of Juan Rodriguez, Continental Carbon's senior vice
president, and passed out leaflets to his neighbors, said Abraham. In addition,
they picketed in front of the Taiwanese-owned company's U.S. headquarters
in Houston. The company wants to eliminate its retirement plan, increase
the employee cost of health insurance between 200 percent and 300 percent
and eliminate severance pay for employees who are laid off, said Todd Carlson,
bargaining unit chairman and vice president of the Paper, Allied-Industrial,
Chemical and Energy Workers International Union Local 5-857 in Ponca City.
Continental Carbon said it has been trying to bargain with union representatives
for more than a year, but the union has expressed no willingness to extend
the bargaining, according to a company statement. "We wish the union would
redirect its efforts from the streets to the bargaining table so that a
mutually satisfactory agreement can be reached," the statement said. "Making
false and defamatory accusations against this company is not a successful
path for reaching a labor agreement," the statement added. The labor group
was on the way back to Oklahoma on Tuesday to pass out leaflets at a tire
plant that buys carbon black from Continental Carbon, Abraham said. Copyright 2002 Houston Chronicle |